Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.496GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 24W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon R300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV360
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

24W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy