ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs AMD FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1
