Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R300
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV360
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

24W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy