ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R300
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
8192
4
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
22 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.5
