ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R300
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
24W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.5
