Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA A2

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS
A2

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GA107
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
Unknown
150 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy