Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FireMV 2250

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
Lower TDP (32W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV516
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
2.1
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy