Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro S9150

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

41W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy