Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V7900

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Cayman
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy