Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
TU116
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy