Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 70W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GA107
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy