Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1552 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.86 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
142.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.098 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
9.098 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
142.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GA106
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
12 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy