Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1830 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
2125 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
272.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
118.1 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
236.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.11 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
236.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
115W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD106
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
AD106-155-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy