Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
-
Shading Units
7168
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
198.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
554.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.48 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
35.48 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
554.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD104
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
AD104-350-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy