Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD103
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy