Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Oct 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
153 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy