Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2019
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Polaris 23
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy