Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-425-B1
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy