Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

ATI Radeon X1600 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 27W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
2
4
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

27W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
R500
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
6.0
2.1
OpenGL
1.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy