Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI FirePro V7900

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Cayman
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy