Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy