Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy