Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy