Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218S
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy