Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy