Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
GK104
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
R500
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy