Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
AD107
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy