Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
34
-
Shading Units
4352
12
TMUs
136
12
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

57W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x Molex
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
AD104
RV570 XL
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy