Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (31.36GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (49W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
480
12
TMUs
24
12
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

49W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R420
GPU Name
Turks
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
Turks GL
R400
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net