ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
12
TMUs
56
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
TU116
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
R400
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
