ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.19GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2011
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
7
-
Shading Units
336
12
TMUs
56
12
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
GF114
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
R400
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
