ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1152
12
TMUs
96
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.77 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.07 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.378 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
GK104
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
R400
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
