ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (36.80GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
36.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
12
TMUs
24
12
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
Oland
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
R400
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1
