NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 2 months late

Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2505MHz vs 2130MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +658%

91.06 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2649

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +330%

11394

OctaneBench

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

295

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +262%

1068

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Dec 2022

Quadro Ada

Generation

Quadro Ada

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

915 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

2505 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

2500 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

48GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

384bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

960.0GB/s

Render Config

-

22

SM Count

142

2816

Shading Units

18176

88

TMUs

568

48

ROPs

192

88

Tensor Cores

568

22

RT Cores

142

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

96 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

481.0 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1423 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

91.06 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

91.06 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W

TDP

300W

250 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

AD102

-

GPU Variant

AD102

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

76.3 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

8.9

6.7

Shader Model

6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Xe DG1 SDV

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU