Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A550M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A550M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Arc A550M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2010MHz vs 900MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +235%
12.35 TFLOPS
Arc A550M
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
115.2 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.373 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.686 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net