NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2010MHz vs 1300MHz)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+131%
12.35 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
256
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
