Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +42486%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600M GS
0.029 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 8M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.80 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-770-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net