Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G110M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G110M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce G110M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G110M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +38493%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce G110M
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G96C
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GE1-B
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy