NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2010MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+522%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
1.983 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1152 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
3072
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.97 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
30.98 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.983 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.97 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N17P-G1-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
