Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2010MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +225%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q
3.789 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1063 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
10
3072
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
71.04 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
118.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
59.20 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.789 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
N17E-G1-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net