Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.00GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2284%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460M
0.518 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N11E-GS-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy