NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2010MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+889%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
