Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 48 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +67%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 48
7.373 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net