Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A380M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A380M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2000MHz vs 1455MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +118%
8.94 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
128
24
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy