NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1125MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

2048 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages

Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +288%

8.94 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

2.304 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Apr 2020

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

GeForce 16 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

930 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

1125 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1250 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

160.0GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

16

-

Compute Units

-

3072

Shading Units

1024

96

TMUs

64

48

ROPs

32

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

36.00 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

72.00 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

4.608 TFLOPS

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.304 TFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

72.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

TU117

-

GPU Variant

N18P-G61-MP2

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

35W

TDP

30W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance