Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +3625%
8.94 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy