Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +200%
8.94 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
9
3072
Shading Units
1152
96
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy