NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1455MHz vs 1250MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

1792 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (35W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +179%

8.94 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro 5300M

3.2 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

Radeon Pro 5300M

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Nov 2019

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

Radeon Pro Mac

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

1000 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

1250 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

20

24

SM Count

-

3072

Shading Units

1280

96

TMUs

80

48

ROPs

32

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

12 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

40.00 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

100.0 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

6.400 TFLOPS

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

3.200 TFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W

TDP

85W

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Navi 14

-

GPU Variant

Navi 14 PROA

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

RDNA 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

7 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

6.4 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon 530X Mobile

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8730M

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU