NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+44%
8.94 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
80
24
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
