Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2005
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
GO6800 U
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
89W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy